Medina Cotto, Petronila v. Diaz Vega, Gregorio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no presumption of irreparable injury in retaliatory discharge cases
• characterizing plaintiff’s request for reinstatement of her employment as “a restoration of the status quo ante”
• “[I]rreparable harm is not established in employee discharge cases by financial distress or inability to find other employment, unless truly extraordinary circumstances are shown.”
• “A retaliatory discharge carries with it the distinct risk that other employees may be deterred from protecting their rights under the Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).