Medicine Shoppe International, Inc. v. Turner Investments, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parties waived public policy argument against arbitration award by raising it for the first time in their brief to the court
• recognizing that other previously recognized grounds for vacating an arbitration award are no longer valid
• rejecting public policy argument against arbitration award that was not presented to the arbitrators
• “Appellants’ claims, including the claim that the arbitrator disregarded the law, are not included among those specifically enumerated in § 10 and are therefore not cognizable.”
• “Courts have no authority to reconsider the merits of an arbitration award, even when the parties allege that the award rests on factual errors.”
• “Appellants’ claims, including the claim that the arbitrator disregarded the law, are not included among those specifically enumerated in § 10 and are therefore not cognizable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).