Medicar Ambulance Co. v. Shalala (In Re Medicar Ambulance Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying 28 recoupment and holding that, although party’s reimbursement on all transactions was 1 governed by one overarching series of regulations, each reimbursement was a separate 2 transaction under an ongoing commercial relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).