Medical Protective Co. v. Kim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing whether the insurer had a duty to defend based on the policy language and whether the insured made a material misrepresentation in his policy application such that the insurer did not have a duty to defend
• “Whether an insured acted unreasonably or vexatiously presents an issue of fact requiring courts to consider the totality of circumstances.”
• for prior acts, a policy may provide full retroactive coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).