Medical Mutual of Ohio, Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding director and officer defendants not liable -because they did not “make” the statements even though they were “ ‘the source’ of the information communicated in the alleged false statements”
• “[I]n the absence of a viable claim of primary liability, plaintiff cannot state a 19 claim against the D&O defendants for control person liability under § 25504[.]”
• “in the absence 25 of a viable claim of primary liability, plaintiff cannot state a claim against the D & O 26 defendants for control person liability under § 25504.”
• “where a plaintiff alleges that a defendant is liable for fraud under an 20 agency theory, Rule 9(b) requires that the existence of the agency relationship be pled 21 with particularity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).