Medical Diagnostic Imaging, PLLC v. Carecore National, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disqualification was not warranted based on counsel’s access to confidential information because such information would otherwise be available in discovery and confers no unfair advantage
• observing that a client’s entire background is not at issue in a case for purposes of disqualification when the client’s finances “are not directly at issue in the current litigation”
• “The risk that an attorney may cross-examine a former client is not sufficient to disqualify an attorney.”
• “The risk that an attorney may cross-examine a former client is not sufficient to disqualify an attorney.”
• “When a would-be intervenor knew or should have known that it has an interest in the litigation is an important factor in determining whether a motion to intervene is timely.”
• among the factors a court will consider when determining whether an attorney-client relationship exists is not only whether a client believes an attorney-client relationship exists, but also whether that belief was reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).