Skip to main content
· 4/11/2008

Medical City Dallas, Ltd. v. Carlisle Corp.

Citations

  • 251 S.W.3d 55
  • 51 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 753
  • 65 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1047
  • 2008 Tex. LEXIS 315
  • 2008 WL 1146752

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a claim based on an express warranty is, in essence, a contract action”
  • holding that breach of express warranty claims are contractual in nature
  • holding that breach of express warranty claims are contractual in nature
  • stating that decision whether 38.001 applied to express warranty claim would be made by determining whether such claim is a suit based in contract
  • noting that courts are to construe section 38.001 liberally to promote its underlying purposes
  • stating that decision whether 38.001 applied to express warranty claim would be made by determining whether such claim is a suit based in contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jefferson, Hecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.