· 4/11/2008
Medical City Dallas, Ltd. v. Carlisle Corp.
Citations
- 251 S.W.3d 55
- 51 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 753
- 65 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1047
- 2008 Tex. LEXIS 315
- 2008 WL 1146752
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “a claim based on an express warranty is, in essence, a contract action”
- holding that breach of express warranty claims are contractual in nature
- holding that breach of express warranty claims are contractual in nature
- stating that decision whether 38.001 applied to express warranty claim would be made by determining whether such claim is a suit based in contract
- noting that courts are to construe section 38.001 liberally to promote its underlying purposes
- stating that decision whether 38.001 applied to express warranty claim would be made by determining whether such claim is a suit based in contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jefferson, Hecht
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.