Medical Assur. Co. of Mississippi v. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “receipt of information in [the plaintiff-insured’s county of residence] is a passive function of his presence there and is not a substantial event causing the damages he claims”
• “[The venue statute] specifically requires a substantial alleged . . . injury-causing event to have happened in a particular jurisdiction in order for venue to be proper there.” (emphasis added
• “Dr. Myers’s complaint does not allege that his decision not to give [the defendant’s] risk management team full access to his practice, including his practice in Holmes County, contributed to his claim. Thus, that fact — even if true — does not meet the ‘alleged’ portion of the test.”
• “Dr. Myers’s complaint does not allege that his decision not to give [the defendant’s] risk management team full access to his practice, including his practice in Holmes County, contributed to his claim. Thus, that fact – even if true – does not meet the ‘alleged’ portion of the test.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).