Medical Ass'n of State v. Shoemake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that four physicians had standing under § 41-22-10 to challenge an amendment to a rule of the Alabama Board of Physical Therapy because the rule would indirectly affect their medical practices
• 'No presumption of correctness exists as to the trial court's application of the law to the facts. Jayroe v. Hall , 624 So.2d 522 (Ala. 1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).