Media General, Inc. v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assessing why Media General did not respond to Smith’s motion for judgment
• “Because we have already concluded that [appellant] did not meet its burden of proving that it was without fault or negligence[,] . . . we need not address the question whether [appellant] met its burden of proving [the other common-law elements].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).