Meden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “simply arguing that a claimant’s physical condition has changed without presenting evidence of its effect on his ability to work at his light duty job cannot satisfy a claimant’s burden of proof’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).