Medeiros v. Murray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• challenge to parole procedures not demanding release or granting of parole proper under section 1983 even though improves chances for parole
• “a denial of parole, based on a facially reasonable ground, is not subject to review by a federal court”
• where the court held a request for a second parole hearing to fall within the ambit of § 1983 rather than habeas corpus
• plaintiff permitted to maintain § 1983 action for injunctive relief from allegedly false information in his prison files; fact or duration of his confinement not an underlying issue
• inmate disagreed with psychiatric evaluation contained in file

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).