Skip to main content
· 3/18/1943

Medeiros v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Citations

  • 57 Cal. App. 2d 707
  • 135 P.2d 676
  • 1943 Cal. App. LEXIS 424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • an allegation that, “by reason of the plaintiff drinking a portion of the contents of said bottle as aforesaid he became violently ill and was rendered sick, sore and disabled,” was sufficient to state a breach of implied warranty claim against Coca-Cola’s bottling company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.