Medeiros v. Atlantic States Mari

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under rational basis review, the proponent of legislation does not need “to support [its reasons for enacting it] with empirical evidence”
• hesitating to disregard Tennessee Electric because doing so might induce a “substantial increase in ... litigation before the federal courts”
• collecting and discussing cases reaching conflicting conclusions with respect to Tenth Amendment standing
• noting also that New York never actually dealt with the question of standing
• collecting and discussing cases reaching conflicting conclusions with respect to Tenth Amendment standing
• “The right to ‘make a living’ is not a ‘fundamental right,’ for either equal protection or substantive due process purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).