Medberry v. Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the imminent danger of serious physical injury must exist at the time the complaint is filed, not at a prior time
• holding that the imminent danger of serious physical injury must exist at the time the complaint is filed, not at a prior time
• holding that the plaintiff must face imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time the complaint is filed, not at a prior time
• holding that the three-strike prisoner was not “under imminent danger of serious physical injury” because the threat he alleged at Everglades Correctional Institution “had ceased prior to the filing of his Complaint”
• holding that allegations of past danger are not sufficient to prove imminent danger under the imminent danger exception to the three-strikes rule in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
• holding that allegations of past danger are not sufficient to prove imminent danger under the imminent danger exception to the three-strikes rule in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).