Skip to main content
· 6/24/1992

Medart, Inc. v. Richard G. Austin, Administrator, General Services Administration

Citations

  • 967 F.2d 579
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 9455
  • 38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,349
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the existence of a different method of estimating does not make the government’s method unreasonable
  • explaining that although “actual purchases vary[ing] significantly from government estimates does not ordinarily give rise to liability on the part of the government . . . the government must act in good faith and use reasonable care in computing its estimated needs”
  • “the risks associated with variance between actual purchases and estimated quantities are allocated to the contractor”
  • “[Pjresumably contractors rely on the proffered estimates in formulating their bids____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nies, Mayer, Plager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.