Med Rehab Therapy Center Inc. v. Direct General Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant who withdrew objection to exclusion of documents waived right to appeal exclusion
• holding that defendant who withdrew objection to exclusion of documents waived right to appeal exclusion
• holding that because defense counsel initially objected to an evidentiary matter but then “withdrew his objection,” the defendant “waived his right to appeal this matter”
• finding defendant “waived his right to appeal” the exclusion of certain evidence where his “counsel withdrew his objection to the exclusion” at trial
• upholding exclusion of additional evidence of bias when “[t]he evidence would have had minimal probative value because it was cumulative, and its admission would have required unnecessary delay”
• relying on Rule 6 403 to affirm the district court’s decision to preclude further questioning on an issue because “the evidence would have had minimal probative value . . . and its admission would have required unnecessary delay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).