· 3/9/2000
Med+ Plus Neck & Back Pain Center v. Noffsinger
Citations
- 726 N.E.2d 687
- 311 Ill. App. 3d 853
- 244 Ill. Dec. 712
- 16 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 188
- 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining a prevailing party for purposes of a fee-shifting provision as one that is successful on any significant issue
- finding amount to be repaid a penalty intended to prevent employee from leaving, rather than recoupment of training expenses, because it bore no relation to employer’s unrecovered training costs
- the plaintiff was not the prevailing party because although it won a judgment on the issue of liability, it lost its claim for liquidated damages and failed to prove any actual damages
- the plaintiff was not the prevailing party because although it won a judgment on the issue of liability, it lost its claim for liquidated damages and failed to prove any actual damages
- points not argued on appeal are waived
- points not argued on appeal are waived
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Inglis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.