Skip to main content
· 3/9/2000

Med+ Plus Neck & Back Pain Center v. Noffsinger

Citations

  • 726 N.E.2d 687
  • 311 Ill. App. 3d 853
  • 244 Ill. Dec. 712
  • 16 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 188
  • 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining a prevailing party for purposes of a fee-shifting provision as one that is successful on any significant issue
  • finding amount to be repaid a penalty intended to prevent employee from leaving, rather than recoupment of training expenses, because it bore no relation to employer’s unrecovered training costs
  • the plaintiff was not the prevailing party because although it won a judgment on the issue of liability, it lost its claim for liquidated damages and failed to prove any actual damages
  • the plaintiff was not the prevailing party because although it won a judgment on the issue of liability, it lost its claim for liquidated damages and failed to prove any actual damages
  • points not argued on appeal are waived
  • points not argued on appeal are waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Inglis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.