Meco Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining an eight-month gap “strongly militates against any inference of anti-union motivation”
• anti-union comments of supervisor did not establish animus of discharge of union adherent where there was \no showing that [supervisor] played any role in [the] discharge\
• antiunion comments of two low-level factory supervisors failed to establish a motivating factor because “neither supervisor * * * had anything to do with [the] discharge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).