Mechanics' & Traders' Bank v. Barnett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the standard for interlocutory appeal is “high” and that such appeals are “rare, and reserved for exceptional circumstances”
• declining to certify interlocutory appeal because “there is not a substantial ground for difference of opinion on any controlling question of law’
• denying interlocutory appeal because “there is not a substantial ground for difference of opinion on any controlling question of law”
• standard for interlocutory appeal is “high” and such appeals are “reserved for exceptional circumstances” (citing cases)
• certification should be “rare, and reserved for exceptional circumstances” (quotation marks omitted)
• interlocutory appeals are “rare, and reserved for exceptional circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).