Mécanique C.N.C., Inc. v. Durr Environmental, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaching the same conclusion when the parties simply disagreed on the legal effect of the undisputed facts surrounding a hybrid transaction
• finding, as a matter of law, that the contract for the fabrication and installation of ductwork and related equipment for an SCR system was governed by the UCC because it was predominantly for the sale of goods
• contract was for the provision of ductwork and the court concluded that the installation service provided was incidental to the purpose “of procuring the necessary ductwork.”
• Likewise “[t]he mere fact that a manufacturer utilizes its effort and expertise in producing a good does not mean that the buyer is purchasing those services instead of the good itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).