Skip to main content
· 1/30/1992

Mec Steel Buildings, Inc. v. San Lorenzo Construction Corp. (In Re Mec Steel Buildings, Inc.)

Citations

  • 136 B.R. 606
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Core proceedings are those involving matters arising under title 11 ..., that is, they would not exist outside of bankruptcy.”
  • collection of a debt due the estate cannot be considered a turnover of property so long as there is some doubt as to the defendant’s liability
  • “clear majority, and better-reasoned, view” is to treat pre-petition accounts receivable as non-core
  • “this is a state law contract claim which arose before the filing of the petition, specifically classified by the court in Arnold as a non-core matter.”
  • “clear majority, and better-reasoned, view” is to treat pre-petition accounts receivable as non-core
  • “[i]f an action would survive outside of bankruptcy, and in the absence of bankruptcy would have been initiated in a state or a district court, then it clearly involves a non-core matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Enrique S. Lamoutte

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.