Skip to main content
· 12/31/2001

Means v. Gates

Citations

  • 558 S.E.2d 921
  • 348 S.C. 161
  • 2001 S.C. App. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \exclusion of the [expert testimony of a neuropsychologist] was not harmless error as there was no equivalent testimony presented to this effect\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Connor, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.