Meaney v. CHS Acquisition Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deeming movant's Rule 7.1(a)(3) Statement admitted where non-movant's response \set forth no citations – specific or otherwise – to the record\
• “The Court is not required to scour the record looking for factual disputes nor to scour the party’s various submissions to piece together appropriate arguments. A court need not make the lawyer’s case.” (quotations and alterations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).