Mealey v. Arndt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that substantial evidence is any relevant evidence that allows a reasonable mind to draw the same conclusion
• noting that “substantial evidence” sufficient to support a verdict is evidence that would permit a reasonable person to reach that result
• collecting cases where boundary marked by fences, monuments, roadways, or buildings
• \A party cannot be said to acquiesce in a boundary unless the boundary can be identified with certainty.\
• “[L]ine must be certain, well defined, and in some fashion physically designated upon the ground.”
• “Substantial evidence is any relevant evidence from which a reasonable mind might draw a conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).