Skip to main content
· 9/26/2013

MeadWestVaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty & Closures, Inc.

Citations

  • 731 F.3d 1258
  • 108 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1296
  • 2013 WL 5356812
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “grounds of invalidity[] must be analyzed on a claim-by-claim basis”
  • explaining that a theory not ultimately raised at a bench trial is waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prost, O'Malley, Taranto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.