Skip to main content

Meadows v. State

Citations

  • 590 S.E.2d 173
  • 264 Ga. App. 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Bruton violation constituted reversible error, where “only evidence directly identifying [defendant] as one of the men at the victim’s door was [co-defendant’s] improperly admitted statement”
  • holding that Bruton violation constituted reversible error, where \only evidence directly identifying [defendant] as one of the men at the victim's door was [co-defendant's] improperly admitted statement\
  • evidence in aggravated assault conviction was sufficient and victim testimony not required where other testimony showed that victim was crying and appeared frightened
  • to show ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to subpoena a witness, defendant must show that the uncalled witness would have benefitted the defendant’s case
  • “only evidence directly identifying [defendant] as one of the men at the victim’s door was [co-defendant’s] improperly admitted statement”
  • reversible error where the evidence was not overwhelming and the only evidence placing defendant at the scene of the crime was non-testifying co-defendant’s improperly admitted statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Ruffin, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.