· 3/23/1954
Meadows v. Bradshaw-Diehl Co.
Citations
- 81 S.E.2d 63
- 139 W. Va. 569
- 1954 W. Va. LEXIS 23
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- approving validity of remedy but denying it under facts of case
- directors generally free, absent bad faith or fraud, to exercise discretion free from judicial interference
- “It is a rule of general application that if there is no fraud or bad faith by the directors, that it is within their discretion whether they declare dividends or otherwise and courts have no right to interfere with such discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lovins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.