Supreme Court of New Jersey· 9/21/1972
Meadowland Reg. Dev. Agency v. Hackensack Meadowlands
Citations
- 299 A.2d 69
- 62 N.J. 72
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- two-year freeze on use of 10,000 acres in Meadowlands pending completion of regional development plan not a taking
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Toms River Affiliates v. DEPT., ENVIRON. PROTEC.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-02-19· cited 30×
- Cappture Realty Corp. v. Bd. of Adj. of Elmwood Pk.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-03-18· cited 27×
- Orleans Builders & Developers v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-05-14· cited 20×
- Redeb Amusement, Inc. v. Tp. of HillsideNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1983-02-16· cited 5×
- Tocco v. COUNCIL ON AFF. HOUSINGNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-07-03· cited 2×
- Shilowitz v. ShilowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1972-09-21
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.