Skip to main content

Meador v. State

Citations

  • 812 S.W.2d 330
  • 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 161
  • 1991 WL 111762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, when the State is the proponent of hearsay evidence, it has the burden of proving its admissibility under the hearsay rules by a preponderance of the evidence
  • holding that, when the State is the proponent of hearsay evidence, it has the burden of proving its admissibility under the hearsay rules by a preponderance of the evidence
  • \[T]he co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule is [] not limited to prosecutions for conspiracy; it is a rule of evidence applicable to any offense.\
  • “[T]he co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule is [] not limited to prosecutions for conspiracy; it is a rule of evidence applicable to any offense.”
  • “[T]he co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule is [] not limited to prosecutions for conspiracy; it is a rule of evidence applicable to any offense.”
  • \[T]he co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule is [] not limited to prosecutions for conspiracy; it is a rule of evidence applicable to any offense.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benavides, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Meador v. State

16 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.