Skip to main content
· 9/27/1909

Meador v. Northwestern Gas & Electric Co.

Citations

  • 55 Wash. 47
  • 103 P. 1107
  • 1909 Wash. LEXIS 703

Syllabus

<p>Contracts — Performance—Evidence—Sufficiency. In an action to recover one thousand dollars due upon the performance of a contract to furnish certain amusement attractions for one month, a verdict for $525 is supported by the evidence, where it appears that plaintiff performed the contract in so far as not excused or prevented from performing by the defendant.</p> <p>Appeal — Review-—-Verdict. A verdict will not be set aside when supported by substantial evidence, even if contrary to the opinion of the court.</p> <p>Appeal — Error Favorable to Appellant — Trial—Verdict. A verdict for a less sum than was due for complete performance of a contract, is not a conclusive finding of nonperformance in its entirety; and is not error prejudicial to the defendant.</p>

Judges: Fullerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.