Meador v. Manlove
Citations
- 97 Kan. 706
- 156 P. 731
- 1916 Kan. LEXIS 383
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Jurisdiction — To Declare Trust in Land in Another State. Where a court of general jurisdiction has secured jurisdiction of the parties who hold the legal title to land in another state, it may render a judgment to impress a trust as to such land and order the trustees to execute a conveyance thereof; and the possible difficulties which may attend the enforcement of its judgment do not in any wise abridge its jurisdiction.</p> <p>2. Nonresident Dependants — Voluntary General Appearance. Where defendants who have been summoned personally and defendants who have been summoned, by publication service join in a pleading or motion raising questions of law and questions of fact involved in the general issue of a cause, a general appearance is thereby entered by all the defendants.</p> <p>3. Oral Agreement to Will Property — “Heirs” to be Benefited. Where a husband and wife agree to make wills of all their respective properties in each other’s favor upon condition that the survivor of the two shall make a new will after the death of the first bequeathing the property received by such a will to the heirs of the deceased spouse, the heirs intended to be benefited thereby are the next of kin who would take under the statute of descents and distributions.</p> <p>4. Same — Statute of Frauds — Statute of Trusts and Powers. Neither the statute of frauds nor the statute of trusts and powers is a bar to the enforcement of an oral agreement to make a will when it has been fully performed by one of the parties, following the rule announced in Gemmel v. Fletcher, 76 Kan. 577, 92 Pac. 713, and Smith v. Cameron, 92 Kan. 652, 141 Pac. 596.</p> <p>5. Evidence — Interest of Witness — No Disqualification. There is no disqualification of witnesses in this state merely because such witnesses are directly or indirectly interested in the outcome of a lawsuit, but their interest may be shown as affecting their credibility. (Civ. Code, § 317.)</p> <p>6. Practic
Judges: Dawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Groza-Vance v. VanceOhio Court of Appeals· 2005-07-28· cited 69×
- Yeager v. YeagerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1942-10-03· cited 40×
- In Re Estate of ShirkSupreme Court of Kansas· 1960-03-05· cited 39×
- Clements v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia· 1928-08-16· cited 26×
- Burnham v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-01-09· cited 23×
- Smith v. NyburgSupreme Court of Kansas· 1932-12-10· cited 21×
- Bateman v. FranklinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-07-07· cited 17×
- King v. IngelsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-11-06· cited 17×
- N. A. Kennedy Butter Tub Co. v. First & Hamilton National Bank of Fort WayneSupreme Court of Kansas· 1924-01-12· cited 16×
- Dent v. MortonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1938-06-11· cited 16×
- Mandley v. BackerD.C. Circuit· 1941-04-21· cited 15×
- Brown v. PughSupreme Court of Kansas· 1949-12-10· cited 14×
- Ed Dewitte Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Fin. Assocs. Midwest, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-09-21· cited 13×
- Rooney v. McDermottSupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-05-08· cited 13×
- Grubb, Administrator v. GrubbSupreme Court of Kansas· 1972-01-22· cited 12×
- Bowen v. GallowaySupreme Court of Kansas· 1928-03-10· cited 12×
- Salvation Army v. Estate of PryorCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1977-09-02· cited 11×
- In Re Estate of HilliardSupreme Court of Kansas· 1952-03-08· cited 10×
- Apple v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-05-08· cited 10×
- Linn v. HoustonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1927-05-07· cited 10×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court· 1909-11-01· cited 284×
- Phelps v. McDonaldSupreme Court· 1879-05-18· cited 112×
- Heery v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas· 1909-06-05· cited 39×
- Nelson v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-04-12· cited 36×
- Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-02-10· cited 32×
- Wooddell v. AllbrechtSupreme Court of Kansas· 1909-10-09· cited 26×
- Smith v. CameronSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-06-06· cited 26×
- Bless v. BlizzardSupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-01-06· cited 24×
- Abercrombie v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Kansas· 1902-01-11· cited 19×
- Neosho Valley Investment Co. v. CornellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1899-03-11· cited 16×
- Holland v. HollandSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-06-07· cited 12×
- Manley v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1898-04-08· cited 9×
- Holland v. HollandSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-02-12· cited 8×
- Kenton v. ShreckIllinois Supreme Court· 1869-09-15· cited 6×
- Frazier v. ResorIllinois Supreme Court· 1859-11-15· cited 4×
- Eadie v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-02-06· cited 3×
- Bailey v. GatewoodSupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-01-09· cited 1×
- Grimshaw v. KentSupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-03-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.