Meade v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• both holding a court may proceed directly to determine whether movant is entitled to remand based on error without separately addressing appropriateness of counsel’s conduct
• both holding a court may proceed directly to determine whether movant is entitled to remand based on error without separately addressing appropriateness of counsel’s conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ham v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-10-05· cited 23×
• Potts v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-07-18· cited 14×
• State v. Light
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-01-04· cited 11×
• Bland v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-01-08· cited 10×
• Myszka v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-02-22· cited 5×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Sanders v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1987-10-13· cited 631×
• Richardson v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-09-30· cited 215×
• Davis v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-02-02· cited 12×
• State v. Johnson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-05-09· cited 12×
• Bradford v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-06-30· cited 12×
• McConnell v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1975-11-03· cited 9×
• Newman v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-04-26· cited 9×
• State v. Meade
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-07-21· cited 4×
• Fullerton v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-03-15· cited 2×