Meade v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• it is a violation of the rules of professional conduct to \intentionally ... misstate the evidence or mislead the jury as to the inferences it may draw\ (quoting Standards for Criminal Justice § 3-5.8 (Am. Bar Ass'n 1980) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Farina v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 64×
• King v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-02· cited 43×
• Gordon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-10· cited 33×
• Kentrell F. Johnson v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2018-03-15· cited 15×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Singer v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-02-13· cited 190×
• Pait v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-11· cited 83×
• Paramore v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1969-09-10· cited 79×
• Washington v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1923-12-17· cited 44×
• Stewart v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1951-04-03· cited 37×
• Grant v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1967-02-01· cited 36×
• Blanco v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1942-03-17· cited 20×
• Harper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-02-23· cited 15×