Meade v. Ratliff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding three months was not sufficiently close in time to support a prima facie claim of retaliation
• finding temporal proximity of two months “is not close enough to support, on its own, an inference of retaliation”
• finding temporal proximity of two months “is not close enough to support, on its own, an inference of retaliation”
• finding temporal proximity of plaintiff’s non-selection for position two months after filing discrimination complaint was “not close enough to support, on its own, an inference of retaliation”
• finding gap of two months, alone, is not sufficient to infer causal connection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).