Meade v. Kubinski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether a party has breached a contract is a question of fact
• holding that damages must avoid “penalizing the liable party” in a case for breach of covenant to return leasehold in as good a condition as when it was originally leased
• holding that whether a party has breached a contract is a question of fact
• reasoning that questions of damages are at the discretion of the trial court
• “Whether a party has breached a contract is a question of fact, and a finding of a breach or lack of a breach will not be disturbed unless it is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).