Meade v. Hampton Diaries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is an “elementary canon of construction that a statute should be interpreted so as not to render one part inoperative”
• stating that “[it is an] elementary cannon of construction that a statute should not be interpreted so as to render one part inoperative.”
• reasoning that a physician must be afforded adequate discretion in the exercise of his medical judgment
• noting that regulations that threaten abortion rights are held to a higher level of clarity
• explaining that absence of an intent requirement is an important factor to be considered when determining whether a statute is unconstitutionality vague
• noting that regulations that threaten abortion rights are held to a higher level of clarity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).