Skip to main content
· 6/19/1959

Meade Electric Co., Etc. v. Hagberg Etc.

Citations

  • 159 N.E.2d 408
  • 129 Ind. App. 631
  • 44 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2312
  • 1959 Ind. App. LEXIS 128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • right-to-work law held not to ban agency shops because of “the plain, unequivocal language” of the law: “To depart from the meaning expressed by the words of the statute is to alter it, and it is not construction but legislation .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.