Skip to main content

Mead v. State

Citations

  • 86 So. 2d 773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failure to instruct jury that grand larceny involved property worth more than $50 was harmless when jury makes specific finding that property taken was worth $51
  • once a defendant elects to testify, his testimony is to be weighed the same as any other witness, and argument directed at what he says and does is justified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.