Skip to main content
· 9/16/2014

Mead v. Reliastar Life Insurance Company

Citations

  • 768 F.3d 102
  • 59 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1792
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17771
  • 2014 WL 4548868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that appealability of sentence four remand is exception to \generally accepted rule that remand orders are interlocutory\
  • observing that appealability of sentence four remand is exception to “generally accepted rule that remand orders are interlocutory”
  • observing that appealability of sentence four remand is exception to “generally accepted rule that remand orders are interlocutory”
  • explaining that the district court’s judgment was not “final” because it “did not set out an amount that [the defendant was] required to pay”
  • “‘An order granting summary judgment on the issue of liability, but requiring a calculation of damages, is not an appealable final order’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.