· 9/16/2014
Mead v. Reliastar Life Insurance Company
Citations
- 768 F.3d 102
- 59 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1792
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17771
- 2014 WL 4548868
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that appealability of sentence four remand is exception to \generally accepted rule that remand orders are interlocutory\
- observing that appealability of sentence four remand is exception to “generally accepted rule that remand orders are interlocutory”
- observing that appealability of sentence four remand is exception to “generally accepted rule that remand orders are interlocutory”
- explaining that the district court’s judgment was not “final” because it “did not set out an amount that [the defendant was] required to pay”
- “‘An order granting summary judgment on the issue of liability, but requiring a calculation of damages, is not an appealable final order’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Winter, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.