Mead v. Phœnix Insurance
Citations
- 68 Kan. 432
- 75 P. 475
- 64 L.R.A. 79
- 1904 Kan. LEXIS 123
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABDS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Fire Insurance — Property of Minor — Limitation of Action. ■ A dwelling-house owned by a minor twelve years of age was insured in his name. In May, 1894, it was destroyed by fire. The policy contained a condition that no suit or action for the recovery of any loss should be maintainable unless commenced within twelve months after the fire. In 1902, when the insured reached his majority, he brought an action on the policy to recover the amount of his loss. Held, that the contract limitation controlled the general statute of limitations and that the action was barred.</p>
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sarmiento v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 2005-10-26· cited 42×
- Maxwell Bros. v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1913-01-22· cited 29×
- Gill v. Manhattan Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court· 1907-03-27· cited 11×
- Hornick v. First Catholic Slovak UnionSupreme Court of Kansas· 1924-03-08· cited 11×
- Coates v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceD. Kansas· 1981-06-05· cited 7×
- Severs v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-11-26· cited 4×
- Reiter v. Ætna Life Ins.D. New Jersey· 1940-05-20· cited 3×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.