Skip to main content
· 4/12/1994

Mead v. M.S.B., Inc.

Citations

  • 264 Mont. 465
  • 51 State Rptr. 348
  • 872 P.2d 782
  • 1994 Mont. LEXIS 86

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “we concluded [in Brewer] that protecting the operators of ski areas from liability for their own negligence bore no relationship to protecting them from liability from inherent risks in the sport of skiing.”
  • noting that “we concluded [in Brewer] that protecting the operators of ski areas from liability for their own negligence bore no relationship to protecting them from liability from inherent risks in the sport of skiing.”
  • finding a ski area operator’s duties to a skier are not limited to only those specifically enumerated in the MSRA
  • reversing summary judgment where injury was caused by exposed rock face at a ski area in part on the grounds that there was no evidence the injured skier was aware of the particular condition that caused his injury or had skied the trail recently enough that he should have been aware

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gray, Harrison, Hunt, Nelson, Trieweiler, Turnage, Weber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.