Skip to main content
· 2/15/1859

Mead v. Dayton

Citations

  • 28 Conn. 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no requirement that indictment of conspiracy allege that all of co-conspirators were employees of bank for charge of embezzlement by bank employees
  • equal responsibility where physically impossible to have committed crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellsworth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.