· 2/15/1859
Mead v. Dayton
Citations
- 28 Conn. 33
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no requirement that indictment of conspiracy allege that all of co-conspirators were employees of bank for charge of embezzlement by bank employees
- equal responsibility where physically impossible to have committed crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellsworth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.