Skip to main content
· 5/23/1990

McWilliams v. Szymanski

Citations

  • 792 P.2d 457
  • 101 Or. App. 617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering whether admission in current proceeding of complaints filed in previous proceeding was abuse of discretion under OEC 403
  • “[A]n order granting a new trial will not be reversed if it can be supported by any of the grounds on which it was sought.” (Emphasis added.)
  • appellate court will uphold trial court’s decision to grant new trial pursuant to ORCP 64 B “if it can be supported by any of the grounds on which it was sought”
  • even if the trial court committed legal error, if that legal error was not excepted to at trial as required by ORCP 64 B(6), that legal error cannot serve as a proper basis for the trial court’s granting of a new trial under ORCP 64 B(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Newman, Deits

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.