Skip to main content
· 12/15/1824

McWhorter v. Marrs

Citations

  • 1 Minor 376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a federal district court’s determination of the date on which the plaintiffs claim accrued was binding on the plaintiff and could not, therefore, be relitigated in the Court of Federal Claims
  • “Altering the theory of recovery does not create a new claim under the transactional approach.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saffold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.