Skip to main content
· 12/10/1959

Federal Case

Citations

  • 272 F.2d 291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff’s suit was untimely where it was brought eleven months after end of conduct giving rise to estoppel in case involving construction bond
  • wherein the Court said, “But while the Act requires written, notice it does not require notice in any particular form.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.