McVey v. State Department of Mines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “government must disclose, as a part of its application for a wiretap warrant, any intention to utilize the services of civilian monitors in the execution of the warrant” but concluding that omission did not require suppression
• rejecting defendant’s argument that application was “mere boilerplate” where affidavit contained specific details about the investigation and about attempts to use less invasive surveillance techniques
• upholding denial of suppression where defendant was not prejudiced by two intercepted non-pertinent calls

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).