MCVAWCD-DOE v. Columbus Ave. Elementary Sch.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Assuming that Mr. Nordfelt’s testimony could properly be cast as that of an expert, Mr. Gomez did not object at trial to the admission of the expert testimony and, therefore, the issue is not properly before this court.”
• explaining that constitutional right to be present “is further protected by” Rule 43
• rejecting contention that, following grant of new trial, objections at the first trial made objections at second trial unnecessary
• reviewing constitutional speedy trial claim for plain error where the issue was not raised at all before the district court
• declining to review unpreserved claim of Speedy Trial Act violation even for plain error
• “[T]he primary type of undercover work that I’ve done has been in Spanish. And so all my experience has been with Spanish terminology.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).