McV Inc. v. King-Seeley Thermos Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] cause of action is created by section 256 which explicitly authorizes judicial resolution of co-inventorship contests over issued patents.”
• “{A suit . . characterized as] a declaratory judgment for the determination of inventorship and co-inventorship . . . is not a declaratory judgment action, and principles of jurisdiction applicable to declaratory suits are not implicated.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• four-year delay triggered equitable estoppel in the patent context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).