McStea v. Rotchford, Brown & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• gathering cases and concluding that most jurisdictions have “universally treated the discovery of an arrest warrant as an intervening circumstance”
• contrasting the “fishing expedition” scenario with “a chance discovery of an outstanding arrest warrant in the course of a seizure that is later determined to be invalid”
• contrasting the “fishing expedition” scenario with “a chance discovery of an outstanding arrest warrant in the course of a seizure that is later determined to be invalid”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).